Code review of KANK

  Admin
  karma level Awesome






1. The program *KANK* has not been built as per the Functionality Design Specifications (script).
2. The director should have first created a proper Design Document (screenplay) and then begun the actual coding.
3. *AmitabhBachchan* is a powerful class with a number of methods and functions but it has not been effectively used.
4. *AbhishekBachchan,* a derived class of *AmitabhBachchan*, inherits all the attributes and properties of its parent class.
5. *ShahRukhKhan* and *RaniMukherjee* are emotionally overloaded and go into an infinite weeping loop every 60 milliseconds.
6. The methods such as *Songs()* and *Cinematography()* have been properly executed and produce fantastic results.
7. *PreityZinta* is an abstract class, which looks pretty but actually does nothing.
8. Functions like *ArjunRampal, JohnAbraham, and Kajol* pass NULL values and are redundant.
9. The program takes an unbearably long time to terminate? about 3 hours and 20 minutes.

10. In User Acceptance Testing, too many defects were found.


Overall, the package is not worth purchasing. You may opt for pirated copies, though.




Related Entries

12
votes
Pappu Can't Code Saala
Admin on Jul/23,2008  
76
votes
International Calling Codes - Plan Area with Complete Listing
by Portonovo Kajanazimudeen on May/23,2010 ( diamond user)
152
votes
Ferrari World Abu Dhabi preview
by Vicky on Jun/07,2010 ( diamond user)
216
votes
Dress Code for 14th Feb :
Admin on Feb/17,2007  
697
votes
Mobile Telephone Number Codes for India
by Mridula on Nov/11,2009 ( diamond user)
48
votes
KANK.. A Software perspective Review
Admin on Feb/17,2007  

Random Pics



Share this with friends

Your Name:
Your Email:

Friends Email: (Atleast 1)


Subscribe for more Fun

Receive best posts in your inbox.

Confirm email
Your Email



Add Your Comments

comments powered by Disqus
User generated content. Copyright respective owners wherever applicable. Contact - admin at binscorner